Citroen Xsara 2004 vs Toyota RAV4 2003

 
Citroen Xsara
2004 - 2005
Toyota RAV4
2003 - 2006
Body: Estate car / wagonCrossover / SUV
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Diesel1.8 Petrol
Diesel (Citroen Xsara) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Toyota RAV4) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences."
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 68 HP125 HP
Torque: 150 NM161 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds12.2 seconds
Citroen Xsara engine produces 57 HP less power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 11 NM less than Toyota RAV4.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no data7.4
Fuel tank capacity: 54 litres57 litres
1030 km with real consumption720 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km280'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Citroen Xsara engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 8 years12 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Citroen C3, Peugeot 206, Citroen C2, Peugeot 1007Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota Corolla Verso
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Citroen Xsara engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.
Toyota RAV4 2003 1.8 engine: The 1ZZ-FE engine is more advanced, lighter, and simpler than its predecessor, emphasizing fuel efficiency and output. However, these improvements have come at the cost of reduced durability compared to earlier cast-iron engines. The engine block features an open-deck cooling design for easier production and lower ...  More about Toyota RAV4 2003 1.8 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.37 m4.26 m
Width: 1.70 m1.74 m
Height: 1.42 m1.70 m
Citroen Xsara is 11 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 28 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data400 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1150 litres
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.1 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`730
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

high
Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Xsara has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 8003200
Pros and Cons: Citroen Xsara has
  • timing belt engine
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower price
Toyota RAV4 has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv