Citroen Xantia 1998 vs Volvo V70 1997

 
Citroen Xantia
1998 - 1998
Volvo V70
1997 - 1999
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 123 HP126 HP
Torque: 176 NM170 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.8 seconds12.5 seconds
Volvo V70 is a more dynamic driving.
Citroen Xantia engine produces 3 HP less power than Volvo V70, but torque is 6 NM more than Volvo V70. Due to the lower power, Citroen Xantia reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.310.1
Citroen Xantia consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xantia could require 30 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 65 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 630 km in combined cycle690 km in combined cycle
860 km on highway850 km on highway

Dimensions

Length: 4.71 m4.72 m
Width: 1.76 m1.76 m
Height: 1.42 m1.41 m
Both cars are similar in size. Citroen Xantia is 1 cm shorter than the Volvo V70, width is practically the same , while the height of Citroen Xantia is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data420 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1580 litres
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters10.2 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen Xantia is 1.2 metres more than that of the Volvo V70, which means Citroen Xantia can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5001`970
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high

below average
Citroen Xantia has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volvo V70 has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Citroen Xantia, so Citroen Xantia quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 10001200
Pros and Cons: Citroen Xantia has
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Volvo V70 has
  • more dynamic
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv