Citroen Xantia 1998 vs Ford Scorpio 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Citroen Xantia is available with front wheel drive, while Ford Scorpio can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.8 - 2.1 | 2.0 - 2.9 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 - 150 HP | 115 - 207 HP | |
Torque: | 135 - 250 NM | 167 - 281 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 - 18 seconds | 9.2 - 13.4 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 10.3 | 8.5 - 12.8 | |
Citroen Xantia petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Scorpio. On average, Citroen Xantia equipped with diesel engines consume 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Scorpio. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.71 m | 4.83 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.87 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
Citroen Xantia is smaller. Citroen Xantia is 12 cm shorter than the Ford Scorpio, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xantia is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen Xantia is 1 metres more than that of the Ford Scorpio, which means Citroen Xantia can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`450 | ~ 1`726 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xantia has
|
Ford Scorpio has
| |