Citroen Nemo 2009 vs Ford Tourneo 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Citroen Nemo is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Ford Tourneo has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.4 | 1.0 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 73 HP | 95 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 - 160 NM | 170 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.2 - 18 seconds | 10.9 - 14.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 6.6 | 4.6 - 8.0 | |
|
Citroen Nemo petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Tourneo. On average, Citroen Nemo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Tourneo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.96 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.85 m | |
| Citroen Nemo is 46 cm shorter than the Ford Tourneo, 3 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Nemo is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 360 litres | 1029 litres | |
|
Ford Tourneo has more luggage space. Citroen Nemo has 669 litres less trunk space than the Ford Tourneo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Nemo is 1.3 metres less than that of the Ford Tourneo, which means Citroen Nemo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`695 | ~ 2`033 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 25 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Nemo has
|
Ford Tourneo has
| |