Citroen Jumpy 2020 vs Toyota Sienna 2010
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | Electric | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 266 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 392 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Citroen Jumpy engine produces 130 HP less power than Toyota Sienna, whereas torque is 132 NM less than Toyota Sienna. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 27.0 kWh/100km | 13.1 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 8.10 € | 24.80 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Electricity€/kWhPetrol€/l | |||
| Range per fill-up: | 316 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| Toyota Sienna gets more mileage from one tank of fuel or charge. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.96 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.99 m | |
| Height: | 1.88 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Citroen Jumpy is smaller, but higher. Citroen Jumpy is 13 cm shorter than the Toyota Sienna, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Jumpy is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 993 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 3810 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Jumpy is 1.5 metres more than that of the Toyota Sienna, which means Citroen Jumpy can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`100 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 17 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Jumpy has
|
Toyota Sienna has
| |