Citroen C6 2005 vs Mazda 3 2006

 
Citroen C6
2005 - 2013
Mazda 3
2006 - 2009
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 2.9 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 215 HP105 HP
Torque: 290 NM145 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.4 seconds11.7 seconds
Citroen C6 is more dynamic to drive.
Citroen C6 engine produces 110 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 145 NM more than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Citroen C6 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.26.9
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Citroen C6 consumes 4.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C6 could require 645 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 72 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 640 km in combined cycle790 km in combined cycle
870 km on highway960 km on highway
Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Mazda 3 2006 1.6 engine: This engine is widely regarded as reliable, though it can develop certain issues over time. One of the most common problems is increased oil consumption, often starting after 120,000 km. This is frequently ...  More about Mazda 3 2006 1.6 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.91 m4.42 m
Width: 1.86 m1.76 m
Height: 1.46 m1.46 m
Citroen C6 is larger.
Citroen C6 is 49 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 10 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 407 litres300 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
no data635 litres
Citroen C6 has more luggage capacity.
Citroen C6 has 107 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3.
Turning diameter: 12.4 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen C6 is 1.5 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Citroen C6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Power steering: Hydraulic power steeringElectric power steering
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering.
Gross weight: 2`271 kg1`725 kg
Net weight:1`816 kg1`190 kg
Load capacity:455 kg535 kg
Citroen C6 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 18 procentiem less than Mazda 3. Therefore, Mazda 3 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety:
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 38001600
Pros and Cons: Citroen C6 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • hydraulic power steering
  • higher safety
Mazda 3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
  • electric power steering
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv