Citroen C4 2008 vs Volvo V40 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Coupe | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 150 HP | 102 - 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 133 - 320 NM | 145 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 - 14.2 seconds | 7.3 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 7.6 | 5.4 - 10.4 | |
|
Citroen C4 petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo V40. On average, Citroen C4 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.41 m | |
| Citroen C4 is 21 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 5 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C4 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 471 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1083 litres | 1421 litres | |
|
Volvo V40 has more luggage space. Citroen C4 has 121 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V40. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V40 (by 338 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C4 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Volvo V40, which means Citroen C4 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`766 | ~ 1`789 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |