Citroen C4 2008 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Coupe | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.1 - 1.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 150 HP | 68 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 133 - 320 NM | 100 - 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 - 14.2 seconds | 8 - 14.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 7.6 | 4.8 - 6.8 | |
|
Citroen C4 petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Colt. On average, a Citroen C4 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Mitsubishi Colt. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Citroen C4 is larger, but lower. Citroen C4 is 46 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Colt, 7 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C4 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1083 litres | 760 litres | |
|
Citroen C4 has more luggage capacity. Citroen C4 has 130 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C4 (by 323 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C4 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Citroen C4 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`766 | ~ 1`482 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |