Citroen C4 Picasso 2013 vs Renault Grand Scenic 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso engine produces 20 HP more power than Renault Grand Scenic, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Renault Grand Scenic. Thanks to more power Citroen C4 Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.4 | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Grand Scenic, which means that by driving the Citroen C4 Picasso over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1300 km in combined cycle | 1360 km in combined cycle | |
| 1440 km on highway | 1500 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 530'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Citroen C4 Picasso engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Peugeot 3008, Citroen C4, Peugeot 5008 | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Grand Scenic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Grand Scenic 2012 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Renault Grand Scenic 2012 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso is smaller. Citroen C4 Picasso is 15 cm shorter than the Renault Grand Scenic, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C4 Picasso is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 537 litres | 645 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 645 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 537 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2063 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C4 Picasso is 0.5 metres less than that of the Renault Grand Scenic, which means Citroen C4 Picasso can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`249 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 Picasso has
|
Renault Grand Scenic has
| |