Citroen C4 Picasso 2013 vs Renault Grand Scenic 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Renault Grand Scenic is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C4 Picasso engine produces 18 HP less power than Renault Grand Scenic, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Renault Grand Scenic. Due to the lower power, Citroen C4 Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 | 4.4 | |
|
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Grand Scenic, which means that by driving the Citroen C4 Picasso over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1370 km in combined cycle | 1360 km in combined cycle | |
| 1440 km on highway | 1500 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Peugeot 207, Citroen C5 | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso is smaller. Citroen C4 Picasso is 15 cm shorter than the Renault Grand Scenic, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C4 Picasso is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 537 litres | 645 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 645 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 537 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2063 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C4 Picasso is 0.5 metres less than that of the Renault Grand Scenic, which means Citroen C4 Picasso can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | 2`249 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 200 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 Picasso has
|
Renault Grand Scenic has
| |