Citroen C4 Picasso 2013 vs Opel Zafira 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Opel Zafira is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C4 Picasso engine produces 53 HP less power than Opel Zafira, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Opel Zafira. Due to the lower power, Citroen C4 Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Zafira, which means that by driving the Citroen C4 Picasso over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Zafira. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1370 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1440 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| 960 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C4 Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Peugeot 207, Citroen C5 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Opel Astra, Opel Insignia | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C4 Picasso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.69 m | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso is 23 cm shorter than the Opel Zafira, width is practically the same , while the height of Citroen C4 Picasso is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 537 litres | 152 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 152 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 537 litres | 710 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1860 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Opel Zafira has more luggage space (by 173 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C4 Picasso is 0.6 metres less than that of the Opel Zafira, which means Citroen C4 Picasso can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Opel Zafira has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C4 Picasso has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Opel Zafira, so Opel Zafira quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 13 200 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 Picasso has
|
Opel Zafira has
| |