Citroen C3 2013 vs Citroen C3 Picasso 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.6 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 120 HP | 92 - 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 - 270 NM | 135 - 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 - 16.2 seconds | 10.7 - 15.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.1 - 6.5 | 3.8 - 6.3 | |
|
Citroen C3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Citroen C3 Picasso. On average, Citroen C3 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C3 Picasso. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.94 m | 4.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Citroen C3 is smaller. Citroen C3 is 16 cm shorter than the Citroen C3 Picasso, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C3 is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 385 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1506 litres | |
|
Citroen C3 Picasso has more luggage space. Citroen C3 has 85 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C3 Picasso. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C3 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Citroen C3 Picasso. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`594 | ~ 1`776 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C3 has
|
Citroen C3 Picasso has
| |