Citroen C3 Picasso 2013 vs Opel Meriva 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 1.2 - 1.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 92 - 115 HP | 75 - 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 - 270 NM | 130 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 - 15.7 seconds | 9 - 16.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 - 6.3 | 4.1 - 6.7 | |
|
Citroen C3 Picasso petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Opel Meriva. On average, Citroen C3 Picasso equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Meriva. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Citroen C3 Picasso is smaller, but slightly higher. Citroen C3 Picasso is 19 cm shorter than the Opel Meriva, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C3 Picasso is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 385 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1506 litres | 1500 litres | |
| Citroen C3 Picasso has 15 litres less trunk space than the Opel Meriva. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C3 Picasso (by 6 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C3 Picasso is 0.9 metres less than that of the Opel Meriva, which means Citroen C3 Picasso can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`776 | ~ 1`964 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C3 Picasso has
|
Opel Meriva has
| |