Citroen C3 Picasso 2013 vs Renault Scenic 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 1.2 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 92 - 115 HP | 110 - 165 HP | |
Torque: | 135 - 270 NM | 151 - 380 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 - 15.7 seconds | 9.1 - 13.4 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 - 6.3 | 4.1 - 8.1 | |
Citroen C3 Picasso petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Scenic. On average, Citroen C3 Picasso equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.10 m | 4.37 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.63 m | 1.64 m | |
Citroen C3 Picasso is smaller. Citroen C3 Picasso is 27 cm shorter than the Renault Scenic, 8 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 385 litres | 470 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1506 litres | 1870 litres | |
Renault Scenic has more luggage space. Citroen C3 Picasso has 85 litres less trunk space than the Renault Scenic. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Scenic (by 364 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen C3 Picasso is 0.4 metres less than that of the Renault Scenic, which means Citroen C3 Picasso can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`776 | ~ 1`995 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | average | |
Average price (€): | 4800 | 6000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C3 Picasso has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |