Citroen C3 Picasso 2013 vs Renault Scenic 2012

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Citroen C3 Picasso
2013 - 2017
Renault Scenic
2012 - 2016
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.2 - 1.61.2 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 92 - 115 HP110 - 165 HP
Torque: 135 - 270 NM151 - 380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.7 - 15.7 seconds9.1 - 13.4 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.8 - 6.34.1 - 8.1
Citroen C3 Picasso petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Scenic. On average, Citroen C3 Picasso equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.10 m4.37 m
Width: 1.77 m1.85 m
Height: 1.63 m1.64 m
Citroen C3 Picasso is smaller.
Citroen C3 Picasso is 27 cm shorter than the Renault Scenic, 8 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 385 litres470 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1506 litres1870 litres
Renault Scenic has more luggage space.
Citroen C3 Picasso has 85 litres less trunk space than the Renault Scenic. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Scenic (by 364 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen C3 Picasso is 0.4 metres less than that of the Renault Scenic, which means Citroen C3 Picasso can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`776~ 1`995
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

average
Average price (€): 48006000
Pros and Cons: Citroen C3 Picasso has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Renault Scenic has
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv