Citroen C3 Picasso 2013 vs Renault Clio 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 0.9 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 92 - 115 HP | 90 - 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 - 270 NM | 135 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 - 15.7 seconds | 6.7 - 12.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 - 6.3 | 3.2 - 6.3 | |
|
Citroen C3 Picasso petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Renault Clio. On average, Citroen C3 Picasso equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.07 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Citroen C3 Picasso is larger. Citroen C3 Picasso is 3 cm longer than the Renault Clio, 3 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C3 Picasso is 19 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 385 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1506 litres | no data | |
|
Citroen C3 Picasso has more luggage capacity. Citroen C3 Picasso has 85 litres more trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`776 | ~ 1`653 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C3 Picasso has
|
Renault Clio has
| |