Citroen C3 Picasso 2013 vs Hyundai i30 2011

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Citroen C3 Picasso
2013 - 2017
Hyundai i30
2011 - 2015
Body: Minivan / MPVHatchback
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.2 - 1.61.4 - 1.8

Performance

Power: 92 - 115 HP90 - 150 HP
Torque: 135 - 270 NM137 - 260 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.7 - 15.7 seconds9.9 - 13.5 seconds
In general, Hyundai i30 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Citroen C3 Picasso. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.8 - 6.33.7 - 6.9
Citroen C3 Picasso petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Hyundai i30. On average, Citroen C3 Picasso equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i30.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.10 m4.30 m
Width: 1.77 m1.78 m
Height: 1.63 m1.47 m
Citroen C3 Picasso is smaller, but higher.
Citroen C3 Picasso is 20 cm shorter than the Hyundai i30, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C3 Picasso is 16 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 385 litres378 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1506 litres1316 litres
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.6 meters
Gross weight: ~ 1`776 kg~ 1`873 kg
Net weight:~ 1`265 kg~ 1`246 kg
Load capacity:~ 511 kg~ 627 kg
Citroen C3 Picasso load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 23 procentiem less than Hyundai i30. Therefore, Hyundai i30 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

below average
Average price (€): 40004400
Pros and Cons: Citroen C3 Picasso has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Hyundai i30 has
  • more powerful and dynamic engines
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv