Citroen C3 Picasso 2013 vs Citroen C4 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 1.2 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 92 - 115 HP | 99 - 150 HP | |
Torque: | 135 - 270 NM | 205 - 370 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 - 15.7 seconds | 9.6 - 12.3 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 - 6.3 | 3.3 - 4.9 | |
Citroen C3 Picasso petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Citroen C4. On average, Citroen C3 Picasso equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.10 m | 4.33 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.63 m | 1.49 m | |
Citroen C3 Picasso is smaller, but higher. Citroen C3 Picasso is 23 cm shorter than the Citroen C4, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C3 Picasso is 14 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 385 litres | 408 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1506 litres | 1183 litres | |
Citroen C3 Picasso has 23 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C3 Picasso (by 323 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen C3 Picasso is 0.9 metres less than that of the Citroen C4, which means Citroen C3 Picasso can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`776 | ~ 1`831 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 4800 | 7600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C3 Picasso has
|
Citroen C4 has
| |