Citroen C3 Picasso 2013 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 92 - 115 HP | 92 - 156 HP | |
Torque: | 135 - 270 NM | 160 - 340 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 - 15.7 seconds | 9 - 13.7 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 - 6.3 | 3.8 - 6.3 | |
Citroen C3 Picasso petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Citroen C4 Picasso. On average, Citroen C3 Picasso equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.10 m | 4.43 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.83 m | |
Height: | 1.63 m | 1.61 m | |
Citroen C3 Picasso is smaller, but slightly higher. Citroen C3 Picasso is 33 cm shorter than the Citroen C4 Picasso, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C3 Picasso is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 385 litres | 537 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1506 litres | no data | |
Citroen C4 Picasso has more luggage space. Citroen C3 Picasso has 152 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen C3 Picasso is 0.2 metres less than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`776 | ~ 1`932 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | low | |
Average price (€): | 4800 | 10 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C3 Picasso has
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has
| |