Citroen C3 Picasso 2013 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2013

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Citroen C3 Picasso
2013 - 2017
Citroen C4 Picasso
2013 -
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.2 - 1.61.6 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 92 - 115 HP92 - 156 HP
Torque: 135 - 270 NM160 - 340 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.7 - 15.7 seconds9 - 13.7 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.8 - 6.33.8 - 6.3
Citroen C3 Picasso petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Citroen C4 Picasso. On average, Citroen C3 Picasso equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.10 m4.43 m
Width: 1.77 m1.83 m
Height: 1.63 m1.61 m
Citroen C3 Picasso is smaller, but slightly higher.
Citroen C3 Picasso is 33 cm shorter than the Citroen C4 Picasso, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C3 Picasso is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 385 litres537 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1506 litresno data
Citroen C4 Picasso has more luggage space.
Citroen C3 Picasso has 152 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C4 Picasso.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen C3 Picasso is 0.2 metres less than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`776~ 1`932
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

low
Average price (€): 480010 800
Pros and Cons: Citroen C3 Picasso has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Citroen C4 Picasso has
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv