Citroen C-Crosser 2007 vs Toyota RAV4 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 232 NM | 224 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
| Citroen C-Crosser and Toyota RAV4 have the same engine power, but Citroen C-Crosser torque is 8 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Citroen C-Crosser reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 10.3 | |
|
The Citroen C-Crosser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen C-Crosser consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that by driving the Citroen C-Crosser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| Citroen C-Crosser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 174 mm (6.9 inches) | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Peugeot 4007 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Previa, Toyota Camry | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Toyota RAV4 2006 2.4 engine: A fairly robust engine, easy to maintain and spare parts are readily available. Not too sensitive to fuel quality. High oil consumption and relatively short chain life (around 170 000 km). | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.72 m | |
| Citroen C-Crosser is 25 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, width is practically the same , while the height of Citroen C-Crosser is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 184 litres | 586 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 184 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 441 litres | 586 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1686 litres | 1470 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space (by 145 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C-Crosser (by 216 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C-Crosser is 1.8 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Citroen C-Crosser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`410 | 2`110 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C-Crosser has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |