Citroen C-Crosser 2007 vs Toyota RAV4 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 232 NM | 224 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Citroen C-Crosser is more dynamic to drive. Citroen C-Crosser and Toyota RAV4 have the same engine power, but Citroen C-Crosser torque is 8 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Citroen C-Crosser reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 10.3 | |
|
The Citroen C-Crosser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen C-Crosser consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that by driving the Citroen C-Crosser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| Citroen C-Crosser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 174 mm (6.9 inches) | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Peugeot 4007 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Previa, Toyota Camry | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.72 m | |
| Citroen C-Crosser is 25 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, width is practically the same , while the height of Citroen C-Crosser is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 441 litres | 586 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1686 litres | 1470 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Citroen C-Crosser has 145 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. This could mean that the Citroen C-Crosser uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C-Crosser (by 216 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C-Crosser is 1.8 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Citroen C-Crosser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`290 | 2`110 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C-Crosser has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |