Citroen C-Crosser 2011 vs Toyota RAV4 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 199 NM | 194 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C-Crosser engine produces 5 HP less power than Toyota RAV4, but torque is 5 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Due to the lower power, Citroen C-Crosser reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 9.0 | |
|
The Citroen C-Crosser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen C-Crosser consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that by driving the Citroen C-Crosser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| Citroen C-Crosser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 174 mm (6.9 inches) | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
| Toyota RAV4 2006 2.0 engine: The 2.0-liter gasoline engine debuted in 2000 as a replacement for the 3S-FE. It features an aluminum block with cast-iron liners and an open cooling jacket, an aluminum 16-valve DOHC cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, and a chain-driven timing system. Most versions of ... More about Toyota RAV4 2006 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.68 m | |
| Citroen C-Crosser is 25 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C-Crosser is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 441 litres | 586 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1686 litres | 1470 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Citroen C-Crosser has 145 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. This could mean that the Citroen C-Crosser uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C-Crosser (by 216 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C-Crosser is 1.8 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Citroen C-Crosser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`110 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C-Crosser has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |