Citroen C-Crosser 2011 vs Dacia Duster 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 199 NM | 148 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
| Citroen C-Crosser engine produces 42 HP more power than Dacia Duster, whereas torque is 51 NM more than Dacia Duster. Despite the higher power, Citroen C-Crosser reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 7.5 | |
|
The Dacia Duster is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen C-Crosser consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Duster, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C-Crosser could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| Citroen C-Crosser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 174 mm (6.9 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Dacia Duster can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Dacia Duster version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from three 4x4 versions of Dacia Duster 2010 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.63 m | |
| Citroen C-Crosser is 34 cm longer than the Dacia Duster, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C-Crosser is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 441 litres | 475 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1686 litres | 1604 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Citroen C-Crosser has 34 litres less trunk space than the Dacia Duster. This could mean that the Citroen C-Crosser uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C-Crosser (by 82 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C-Crosser is 1.2 metres more than that of the Dacia Duster, which means Citroen C-Crosser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`710 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C-Crosser has
|
Dacia Duster has
| |