Citroen C-Crosser 2007 vs Toyota RAV4 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Citroen C-Crosser is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Toyota RAV4 can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Citroen C-Crosser also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.4 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 - 170 HP | 136 - 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 199 - 380 NM | 194 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 12.5 seconds | 9.3 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 - 9.4 | 6.6 - 10.3 | |
|
Citroen C-Crosser petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota RAV4. On average, Citroen C-Crosser equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 174 mm (6.9 inches) | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
| Citroen C-Crosser is 25 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 441 litres | 586 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1686 litres | 1470 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Citroen C-Crosser has 145 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. This could mean that the Citroen C-Crosser uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C-Crosser (by 216 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C-Crosser is 1.8 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Citroen C-Crosser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`344 | ~ 2`134 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C-Crosser has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |