Citroen C-Crosser 2007 vs Kia Sorento 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Citroen C-Crosser is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Kia Sorento can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Citroen C-Crosser also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.4 | 2.5 - 3.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 - 170 HP | 170 - 262 HP | |
| Torque: | 199 - 380 NM | 307 - 392 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 12.5 seconds | 9.2 - 12.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 - 9.4 | 7.9 - 12.4 | |
|
Citroen C-Crosser petrol engines consumes on average 3.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Kia Sorento. On average, Citroen C-Crosser equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sorento. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 174 mm (6.9 inches) | 208 mm (8.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Kia Sorento can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.74 m | |
| Citroen C-Crosser is 6 cm longer than the Kia Sorento, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C-Crosser is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 441 litres | 486 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1686 litres | 1751 litres | |
|
Kia Sorento has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Citroen C-Crosser has 45 litres less trunk space than the Kia Sorento. This could mean that the Citroen C-Crosser uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Sorento (by 65 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C-Crosser is 0.2 metres more than that of the Kia Sorento. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`344 | ~ 2`472 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C-Crosser has
|
Kia Sorento has
| |