Chrysler Sebring 2001 vs Audi TT 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 203 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 262 NM | 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
| Chrysler Sebring engine produces 23 HP more power than Audi TT, whereas torque is 27 NM more than Audi TT. Despite the higher power, Chrysler Sebring reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 8.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.3 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
|
The Audi TT is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Sebring consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Sebring could require 360 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Sebring consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi TT gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chrysler Sebring engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Chrysler 300C, Chrysler 300M, Dodge Intrepid | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Seat Ibiza, Seat Leon | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Sebring might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Audi TT 1999 1.8 engine: The engine is considered reliable, with a lifespan from 300,000 km.
The primary causes of unstable operation include air leaks through the crankcase ventilation system, throttle body malfunctions, idle air ... More about Audi TT 1999 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.92 m | 4.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.35 m | |
| Chrysler Sebring is 88 cm longer than the Audi TT, width is practically the same , while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 220 litres | |
|
Chrysler Sebring has more luggage capacity. Chrysler Sebring has 100 litres more trunk space than the Audi TT. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 1 metres more than that of the Audi TT, which means Chrysler Sebring can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`990 | 1`640 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Audi TT has
| |