Chrysler Pacifica 2016 vs Toyota Sienna 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 291 HP | 266 HP | |
| Torque: | 355 NM | 392 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chrysler Pacifica engine produces 25 HP more power than Toyota Sienna, but torque is 37 NM less than Toyota Sienna. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 13.1 | |
|
The Chrysler Pacifica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Pacifica consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Sienna, which means that by driving the Chrysler Pacifica over 15,000 km in a year you can save 360 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 700 km on highway | ||
| Chrysler Pacifica gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 131 mm (5.2 inches) | 168 mm (6.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Toyota Sienna can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Toyota Sienna version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 21 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Jeep Wrangler | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota RAV4, Lexus RX, Toyota Camry, Lexus ES | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Sienna might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.18 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 2.02 m | 1.99 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Chrysler Pacifica is larger. Chrysler Pacifica is 9 cm longer than the Toyota Sienna, 4 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Pacifica is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 915 litres | 993 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3979 litres | 3810 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Chrysler Pacifica has 78 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Sienna. This could mean that the Chrysler Pacifica uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Pacifica (by 169 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Pacifica is 0.7 metres more than that of the Toyota Sienna, which means Chrysler Pacifica can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`724 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 33 600 | 18 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Pacifica has
|
Toyota Sienna has
| |