Chrysler Pacifica 2016 vs Ford Tourneo 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Chrysler Pacifica) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Ford Tourneo) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 291 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 355 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 14.7 seconds | |
| Chrysler Pacifica engine produces 196 HP more power than Ford Tourneo, whereas torque is 125 NM more than Ford Tourneo. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 4.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Tourneo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Pacifica consumes 6.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Tourneo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Pacifica could require 915 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Pacifica consumes 5.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Tourneo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 1300 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 1070 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Tourneo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.18 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 2.02 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.85 m | |
|
Chrysler Pacifica is larger, but lower. Chrysler Pacifica is 76 cm longer than the Ford Tourneo, 19 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Pacifica is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 915 litres | 1029 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3979 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Tourneo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chrysler Pacifica has 114 litres less trunk space than the Ford Tourneo. This could mean that the Chrysler Pacifica uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Pacifica is 0.8 metres more than that of the Ford Tourneo, which means Chrysler Pacifica can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`724 | 2`045 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 29 800 | 26 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Pacifica has
|
Ford Tourneo has
| |