Chrysler Pacifica 2016 vs Ford Tourneo 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 291 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 355 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
| Chrysler Pacifica engine produces 141 HP more power than Ford Tourneo, whereas torque is 115 NM more than Ford Tourneo. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 8.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 9.8 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Tourneo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Pacifica consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Tourneo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Pacifica could require 405 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Pacifica consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Tourneo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Jeep Wrangler | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Ford Focus, Ford C-Max | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Ford Tourneo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Chrysler Pacifica engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.18 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 2.02 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.85 m | |
|
Chrysler Pacifica is larger, but lower. Chrysler Pacifica is 76 cm longer than the Ford Tourneo, 19 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Pacifica is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 915 litres | 1029 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3979 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Tourneo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chrysler Pacifica has 114 litres less trunk space than the Ford Tourneo. This could mean that the Chrysler Pacifica uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Pacifica is 0.8 metres more than that of the Ford Tourneo, which means Chrysler Pacifica can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`724 | 2`045 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 31 400 | 29 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Pacifica has
|
Ford Tourneo has
| |