Chrysler Crossfire 2003 vs BMW Z4 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 218 HP | 265 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 315 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 seconds | 6 seconds | |
|
BMW Z4 is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Crossfire engine produces 47 HP less power than BMW Z4, whereas torque is 5 NM less than BMW Z4. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Crossfire reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 9.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.9 l/100km | 9.8 l/100km | |
|
The BMW Z4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Crossfire consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW Z4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Crossfire could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Crossfire consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW Z4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 550 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chrysler Crossfire engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes ML | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 7 sērija, BMW 1 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Crossfire might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW Z4 2006 3.0 engine: The BMW N52 engine was the first water-cooled engine to feature a composite cylinder block made from a magnesium and aluminum alloy. It was included in Ward’s AutoWorld’s list of the top 10 engines in 2006 and 2007. While it offers many advantages, the ... More about BMW Z4 2006 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 4.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.27 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chrysler Crossfire is 3 cm shorter than the BMW Z4, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Crossfire is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Crossfire is 0.5 metres more than that of the BMW Z4, which means Chrysler Crossfire can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`665 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 14 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Crossfire has
|
BMW Z4 has
| |