Chrysler 200 2010 vs Chevrolet Impala 2006
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 287 HP | 214 HP | |
Torque: | 353 NM | 290 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 seconds | 9 seconds | |
Chrysler 200 is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler 200 engine produces 73 HP more power than Chevrolet Impala, whereas torque is 63 NM more than Chevrolet Impala. Thanks to more power Chrysler 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 9.0 | |
Chrysler 200 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Impala, which means that by driving the Chrysler 200 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 66 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
510 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Chrysler 200 2010 3.6 engine: The variable valve timing regulators, oil pump, water pump, and thermostat are known for their limited lifespan. Another common issue is the clogging of oil channels with wear particles.
After ... More about Chrysler 200 2010 3.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.87 m | 5.09 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.49 m | |
Chrysler 200 is smaller. Chrysler 200 is 22 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Impala, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 385 litres | 527 litres | |
Chevrolet Impala has more luggage space. Chrysler 200 has 142 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Impala. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`087 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | 5200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 200 has
|
Chevrolet Impala has
| |