Chrysler 200 2014 vs Honda Accord 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chrysler 200 is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Honda Accord has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Chrysler 200 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Honda Accord can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.4 - 3.6 | 2.0 - 3.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 187 - 300 HP | 150 - 281 HP | |
| Torque: | 234 - 355 NM | 190 - 342 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 - 9 seconds | 7.2 - 11.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 - 10.2 | 7.4 - 9.2 | |
|
Chrysler 200 petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda Accord. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chrysler 200 and Honda Accord are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 463 litres | 492 litres | |
|
Honda Accord has more luggage space. Chrysler 200 has 29 litres less trunk space than the Honda Accord. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler 200 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Honda Accord, which means Chrysler 200 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`141 | ~ 1`980 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 12 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 200 has
|
Honda Accord has
| |