Chevrolet Matiz 2005 vs Nissan Micra 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 0.8 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 51 HP | 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 69 NM | 110 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17 seconds | 13.9 seconds | |
|
Nissan Micra is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Matiz engine produces 29 HP less power than Nissan Micra, whereas torque is 41 NM less than Nissan Micra. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Matiz reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Chevrolet Matiz is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Chevrolet Matiz consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Matiz could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Chevrolet Matiz consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 38 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Micra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.50 m | 3.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.50 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Chevrolet Matiz is smaller. Chevrolet Matiz is 22 cm shorter than the Nissan Micra, 16 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Matiz is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 584 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Matiz is 0.8 metres less than that of the Nissan Micra, which means Chevrolet Matiz can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 751 | 1`475 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Nissan Micra has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Matiz has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Nissan Micra, so Nissan Micra quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Matiz has
|
Nissan Micra has
| |