Chevrolet Lacetti 2005 vs Mazda 3 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.3 - 2.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 94 - 122 HP | 84 - 265 HP | |
| Torque: | 131 - 280 NM | 122 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 - 11.6 seconds | 6.1 - 14.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 9.1 | 4.7 - 9.7 | |
|
Chevrolet Lacetti petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. On average, Chevrolet Lacetti equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Chevrolet Lacetti is smaller. Chevrolet Lacetti is 12 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Lacetti is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 275 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1229 litres | |
|
Mazda 3 has more luggage space. Chevrolet Lacetti has 25 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Lacetti is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mazda 3, which means Chevrolet Lacetti can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`651 | ~ 1`808 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.8/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Lacetti has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |