Chevrolet Impala 2013 vs Chrysler 200 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 309 HP | 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 358 NM | 354 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.5 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Impala engine produces 9 HP more power than Chrysler 200, whereas torque is 4 NM more than Chrysler 200. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 9.7 | |
|
The Chrysler 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Impala consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 200, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Impala could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| Chevrolet Impala gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chrysler 200 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Chevrolet Camaro, Chevrolet Equinox | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler 300C, Jeep Wrangler | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler 200 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.11 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.49 m | |
| Chevrolet Impala is 23 cm longer than the Chrysler 200, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | 463 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Impala has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Impala has 69 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler 200. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Impala is 0.3 metres less than that of the Chrysler 200. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`240 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Impala has
|
Chrysler 200 has
| |