Chevrolet Impala 2006 vs Chrysler 200 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.9 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 287 HP | |
| Torque: | 328 NM | 353 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.5 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Impala engine produces 47 HP less power than Chrysler 200, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Chrysler 200. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 8.1 | |
| Chevrolet Impala consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 200, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Impala could require 315 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 510 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Chrysler 200 2010 3.6 engine: The variable valve timing regulators, oil pump, water pump, and thermostat are known for their limited lifespan. Another common issue is the clogging of oil channels with wear particles.
After ... More about Chrysler 200 2010 3.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Chevrolet Impala is larger. Chevrolet Impala is 22 cm longer than the Chrysler 200, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 527 litres | 385 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Impala has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Impala has 142 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler 200. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`087 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Impala has
|
Chrysler 200 has
| |