Chevrolet Express 2002 vs Toyota Sienna 2010
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 5.3 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 299 HP | 266 HP | |
Torque: | 447 NM | 392 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
Chevrolet Express engine produces 33 HP more power than Toyota Sienna, whereas torque is 55 NM more than Toyota Sienna. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 15.7 | 13.1 | |
The Toyota Sienna is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Express consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Sienna, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Express could require 390 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 117 litres | 75 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
840 km on highway | 700 km on highway | ||
Chevrolet Express gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Toyota Sienna) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Chevrolet Express) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 8 years | 21 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chevrolet Suburban, Chevrolet Tahoe | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota RAV4, Lexus RX, Toyota Camry, Lexus ES | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Sienna might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.69 m | 5.09 m | |
Width: | 2.02 m | 1.99 m | |
Height: | 2.07 m | 1.75 m | |
Chevrolet Express is larger. Chevrolet Express is 61 cm longer than the Toyota Sienna, 3 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Express is 32 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 993 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 3810 litres | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 23 600 | 18 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Express has
|
Toyota Sienna has
| |