Chevrolet Cruze 2011 vs Mazda 3 2006

 
Chevrolet Cruze
2011 - 2012
Mazda 3
2006 - 2009
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 109 HP105 HP
Torque: 150 NM145 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.5 seconds12.7 seconds
Chevrolet Cruze engine produces 4 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Mazda 3. Despite the higher power, Chevrolet Cruze reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.37.8
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Chevrolet Cruze consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Cruze could require 75 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 720 km in combined cycle700 km in combined cycle

Engines

Engine production duration: 11 years16 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chevrolet Aveo, Chevrolet Lacetti, Chevrolet NubiraInstalled on at least 5 other car models, including Mazda Xedos 6, Mazda MX-3, Kia RIO, Kia Cerato, Kia Carens
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda 3 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.60 m4.42 m
Width: 1.79 m1.76 m
Height: 1.48 m1.46 m
Chevrolet Cruze is larger.
Chevrolet Cruze is 18 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 3 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Cruze is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 450 litres300 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data635 litres
Chevrolet Cruze has more luggage capacity.
Chevrolet Cruze has 150 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3.
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.9 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`8131`750
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

high
Mazda 3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Cruze has serious deffects in 160 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): no data2000
Pros and Cons: Chevrolet Cruze has
  • roomier boot
Mazda 3 has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv