Chevrolet Captiva 2019 vs Mazda CX-3 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 149 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 249 NM | 207 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Captiva engine produces 1 HP less power than Mazda CX-3, but torque is 42 NM more than Mazda CX-3. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.7 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 44 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Mazda CX-3 2018: AWD system provides 98% of power to the front under normal conditions and can shift up to 50% of torque to the rear if wheels slip. | |||
| Mazda CX-3 2018 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda CX-3 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva is larger. Chevrolet Captiva is 38 cm longer than the Mazda CX-3, 7 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Captiva is 22 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1081 litres | 1260 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`950 | 1`808 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 17 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mazda CX-3 has
| |