Chevrolet Captiva 2015 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Chevrolet Captiva is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Toyota Land Cruiser can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Chevrolet Captiva also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.2 - 3.0 | 2.7 - 4.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 167 - 258 HP | 163 - 282 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 - 400 NM | 246 - 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 - 11 seconds | 9.2 - 13.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 - 9.5 | 7.4 - 12.5 | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva petrol engines consumes on average 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Land Cruiser. On average, Chevrolet Captiva equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.85 m | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva is smaller. Chevrolet Captiva is 11 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Captiva is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 477 litres | 640 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1577 litres | 1934 litres | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has more luggage space. Chevrolet Captiva has 163 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Land Cruiser. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Land Cruiser (by 357 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Captiva is 0.5 metres more than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Chevrolet Captiva can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`411 | ~ 2`928 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 27 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Captiva has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |