Chevrolet Captiva 2015 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2013

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Chevrolet Captiva
2015 - 2018
Toyota Land Cruiser
2013 - 2017
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Chevrolet Captiva is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Toyota Land Cruiser can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Chevrolet Captiva also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 2.2 - 3.02.7 - 4.0

Performance

Power: 167 - 258 HP163 - 282 HP
Torque: 230 - 400 NM246 - 450 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.8 - 11 seconds9.2 - 13.8 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.8 - 9.57.4 - 12.5
Chevrolet Captiva petrol engines consumes on average 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Land Cruiser. On average, Chevrolet Captiva equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.67 m4.78 m
Width: 1.85 m1.89 m
Height: 1.73 m1.85 m
Chevrolet Captiva is smaller.
Chevrolet Captiva is 11 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Captiva is 12 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 477 litres640 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1577 litres1934 litres
Toyota Land Cruiser has more luggage space.
Chevrolet Captiva has 163 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Land Cruiser. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Land Cruiser (by 357 litres).
Turning diameter: 12.3 meters11.8 meters
The turning circle of the Chevrolet Captiva is 0.5 metres more than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Chevrolet Captiva can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`411~ 2`928
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
low
no data
Average price (€): no data27 800
Pros and Cons: Chevrolet Captiva has
  • also available in 2WD
  • lower fuel consumption
Toyota Land Cruiser has
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv