Chevrolet Camaro 1998 vs Audi TT 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 305 NM | 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Camaro engine produces 13 HP more power than Audi TT, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Audi TT. Despite the higher power, Chevrolet Camaro reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.4 | 8.2 | |
|
The Audi TT is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Camaro consumes 4.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Camaro could require 630 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 470 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 610 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| Audi TT gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi TT) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Chevrolet Camaro) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Audi TT 1999 1.8 engine: The engine is considered reliable, with a lifespan from 300,000 km.
The primary causes of unstable operation include air leaks through the crankcase ventilation system, throttle body malfunctions, idle air ... More about Audi TT 1999 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.91 m | 4.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.35 m | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is larger, but lower. Chevrolet Camaro is 87 cm longer than the Audi TT, 12 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Camaro is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 220 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Camaro is 1.6 metres more than that of the Audi TT, which means Chevrolet Camaro can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`640 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
Audi TT has
| |