Chevrolet Camaro 1997 vs Nissan 200 SX 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chevrolet Camaro is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Nissan 200 SX has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 3.8 | 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 203 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 305 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 7.5 - 8.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 8.8 - 8.9 | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan 200 SX. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.92 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is larger. Chevrolet Camaro is 40 cm longer than the Nissan 200 SX, 15 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 923 litres | 307 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Camaro has 616 litres more trunk space than the Nissan 200 SX. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 9.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`872 | ~ 1`780 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
Nissan 200 SX has
| |