Chevrolet Aveo 2004 vs Volvo S40 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 94 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 131 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Volvo S40 is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Aveo engine produces 42 HP less power than Volvo S40, whereas torque is 209 NM less than Volvo S40. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Aveo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo S40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Aveo consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Aveo could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Aveo consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo S40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.31 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Chevrolet Aveo is smaller, but higher. Chevrolet Aveo is 16 cm shorter than the Volvo S40, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Aveo is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | 404 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 883 litres | |
|
Volvo S40 has more luggage space. Chevrolet Aveo has 29 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S40. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Aveo is 1 metres less than that of the Volvo S40, which means Chevrolet Aveo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`535 | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | Chevrolet Aveo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo S40 has serious deffects in 125 percent more cases than Chevrolet Aveo, so Chevrolet Aveo quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.3/10 | 8.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Aveo has
|
Volvo S40 has
| |