BMW X6 2012 vs BMW X6 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 381 HP | 306 HP | |
| Torque: | 740 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.3 seconds | 6.5 seconds | |
|
BMW X6 2012 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X6 2012 engine produces 75 HP more power than BMW X6 2010, whereas torque is 140 NM more than BMW X6 2010. Thanks to more power BMW X6 2012 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.0 l/100km | 10.5 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X6 2012 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification BMW X6 2012 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X6 2010, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW X6 2012 could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, BMW X6 2012 consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X6 2010. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1100 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| 940 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.88 m | 4.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.98 m | 1.98 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.69 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. BMW X6 2012 and BMW X6 2010 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 570 litres | 570 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1450 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.8 meters | 12.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`700 | 2`710 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 17 400 | 13 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X6 has
|
BMW X6 has
| |