BMW X6 2012 vs BMW X6 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 HP | 306 HP | |
| Torque: | 540 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 6.5 seconds | |
|
BMW X6 2010 is a more dynamic driving. BMW X6 2012 engine produces 61 HP less power than BMW X6 2010, whereas torque is 60 NM less than BMW X6 2010. Due to the lower power, BMW X6 2012 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.2 l/100km | 10.5 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X6 2012 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW X6 2012 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X6 2010, which means that by driving the BMW X6 2012 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW X6 2012 consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X6 2010. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1140 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| 920 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 212 mm (8.3 inches) | 212 mm (8.3 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW X6 2012 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 7 sērija | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 7 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X6 2012 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.88 m | 4.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.98 m | 1.98 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.69 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. BMW X6 2012 and BMW X6 2010 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 570 litres | 570 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1450 litres | 1450 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.8 meters | 12.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`675 | 2`710 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 17 400 | 13 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X6 has
|
BMW X6 has
| |