BMW X5 2018 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 340 HP | 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.5 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
|
BMW X5 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X5 engine produces 91 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, but torque is 150 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Thanks to more power BMW X5 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 6.9 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. BMW X5 consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW X5 could require 285 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 83 litres | 86 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 1240 km in combined cycle | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 7 sērija, BMW 1 sērija | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.92 m | 4.88 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.80 m | |
| BMW X5 is 4 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, 7 cm narrower, while the height of BMW X5 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 645 litres | 780 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1860 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, BMW X5 has 135 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. This could mean that the BMW X5 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.6 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X5 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 3`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 60 600 | 63 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X5 has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |