BMW X2 2017 vs Nissan Qashqai 2021
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 158 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is a more dynamic driving. BMW X2 engine produces 18 HP less power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Nissan Qashqai. Due to the lower power, BMW X2 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW X2 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW X2 could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW X2 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW X2 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X1, BMW 2 sērija, BMW 4 sērija | Used also on Nissan X-Trail | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X2 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW X2 2017 1.5 engine: The B38 1.5-liter three-cylinder petrol engine, introduced in 2013, was designed with a focus on fuel efficiency and low emissions to meet modern environmental standards. While it received generally positive ... More about BMW X2 2017 1.5 engine Nissan Qashqai 2021 1.3 engine: No major systemic issues have been identified with this engine over the years. The most commonly reported concerns—though not widespread—include unstable idle, intake valve contamination, and complaints ... More about Nissan Qashqai 2021 1.3 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.63 m | |
|
BMW X2 is smaller. BMW X2 is 7 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, 1 cm narrower, while the height of BMW X2 is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 436 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1355 litres | 1447 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Nissan Qashqai may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 92 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X2 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`005 kg | 1`985 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`415 kg | 1`393 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 590 kg | 592 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 400 | 22 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X2 has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |