BMW X1 2019 vs Nissan Qashqai 2021
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Diesel (BMW X1) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Nissan Qashqai) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 158 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is a more dynamic driving. BMW X1 engine produces 8 HP less power than Nissan Qashqai, but torque is 80 NM more than Nissan Qashqai. Due to the lower power, BMW X1 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X1 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW X1 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that by driving the BMW X1 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW X1 consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| 940 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X1 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 1 sērija, BMW 2 sērija, BMW X2 | Used also on Nissan X-Trail | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X1 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW X1 2019 2.0 engine: A fairly reliable engine with a long service life. On the whole, the chains are more reliable than in the BMW N-series engines, but they also have a tendency to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs to be ... More about BMW X1 2019 2.0 engine Nissan Qashqai 2021 1.3 engine: No major systemic issues have been identified with this engine over the years. The most commonly reported concerns—though not widespread—include unstable idle, intake valve contamination, and complaints ... More about Nissan Qashqai 2021 1.3 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.63 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. BMW X1 is 2 cm longer than the Nissan Qashqai, 1 cm narrower, while the height of BMW X1 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 436 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1550 litres | 1447 litres | |
|
BMW X1 has more luggage capacity. BMW X1 has 69 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X1 (by 103 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X1 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`125 | 1`985 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 29 000 | 26 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X1 has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |