BMW 3 series 2005 vs Peugeot 307 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 147 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
BMW 3 series is more dynamic to drive. BMW 3 series engine produces 40 HP more power than Peugeot 307, whereas torque is 53 NM more than Peugeot 307. Thanks to more power BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 307 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification BMW 3 series consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 307, which means that by driving the BMW 3 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, BMW 3 series consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 307. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3, BMW X1, BMW Z4 | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Peugeot 206, Peugeot 207 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 307 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Peugeot 307 2002 1.6 engine: Relatively reliable engine, the main problems tend to be with the engine control electronics. The engine is demanding on fuel quality and fuel consumption is relatively high. It is highly recommended to ... More about Peugeot 307 2002 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.51 m | |
|
BMW 3 series is larger, but lower. BMW 3 series is 10 cm longer than the Peugeot 307, 6 cm wider, while the height of BMW 3 series is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 340 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1385 litres | 1540 litres | |
| BMW 3 series has 120 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 307. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 307 (by 155 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`970 kg | 1`923 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`435 kg | 1`324 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 535 kg | 599 kg | |
| BMW 3 series load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 12 procentiem less than Peugeot 307. Therefore, Peugeot 307 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Peugeot 307 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Peugeot 307, so Peugeot 307 quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 6.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
Peugeot 307 has
| |