BMW 3 series 2007 vs Volkswagen EOS 2006

 
BMW 3 series
2007 - 2010
Volkswagen EOS
2006 - 2011
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain and belt

Performance

Power: 170 HP150 HP
Torque: 210 NM200 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.1 seconds9.8 seconds
BMW 3 series is more dynamic to drive.
BMW 3 series engine produces 20 HP more power than Volkswagen EOS, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Volkswagen EOS. Thanks to more power BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.68.5
Real fuel consumption: 8.1 l/100km8.5 l/100km
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification BMW 3 series consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen EOS, which means that by driving the BMW 3 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 3 series consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen EOS.
Fuel tank capacity: 63 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 950 km in combined cycle640 km in combined cycle
1210 km on highway850 km on highway
770 km with real consumption640 km with real consumption
BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Volkswagen EOS) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 3 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.
Ground clearance: 138 mm (5.4 inches)106 mm (4.2 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, BMW 3 series can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this BMW 3 series version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 6 years5 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 1 sērijaInstalled on at least 9 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Audi A3, Seat Altea, Seat Leon
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen EOS might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.58 m4.41 m
Width: 1.78 m1.79 m
Height: 1.38 m1.44 m
BMW 3 series is 17 cm longer than the Volkswagen EOS, 1 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 3 series is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 210 litres205 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
350 litres380 litres
BMW 3 series has 5 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen EOS. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen EOS (by 30 litres).
Turning diameter: no data10.9 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`0251`950
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

above average
Volkswagen EOS has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volkswagen EOS, so Volkswagen EOS quality is probably better
Average price (€): 98005600
Pros and Cons: BMW 3 sērija has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher ground clearance
Volkswagen EOS has
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv