Audi TT 1999 vs Volvo C70 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 235 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is more dynamic to drive. Audi TT engine produces 17 HP more power than Volvo C70, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Volvo C70. Thanks to more power Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 9.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.0 l/100km | 9.7 l/100km | |
|
The Audi TT is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi TT consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C70, which means that by driving the Audi TT over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi TT consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C70. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi TT 1999 1.8 engine: The engine is considered reliable, with a lifespan from 300,000 km.
The primary causes of unstable operation include air leaks through the crankcase ventilation system, throttle body malfunctions, idle air ... More about Audi TT 1999 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.04 m | 4.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Audi TT is smaller. Audi TT is 68 cm shorter than the Volvo C70, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Audi TT is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 262 litres | |
|
Volvo C70 has more luggage space. Audi TT has 42 litres less trunk space than the Volvo C70. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi TT is 1.7 metres less than that of the Volvo C70, which means Audi TT can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`640 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Audi TT has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo C70 has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
Volvo C70 has
| |